Business Continuity Planning for Mathematicians...

Mathematicians try to reduce every problem to another problem with a known solution. It's a good approach for mathematics, but it's an expensive one for Business Continuity.

A Teapot
There’s a mathematician’s joke (yes, mathematicians do actually have jokes) which goes like this:

  1. Given an empty kettle, running water, a teapot, and a tea bag, how does a mathematician make tea? He fills the kettle with cold water, boils the kettle, pours the boiling water into the teapot, adds a tea bag, waits three-and-a-half minutes, then pours the tea.
  2. Given an kettle full of boiling water, a teapot, and a tea bag, how does a mathematician make tea? He empties the kettle, thus reducing the problem to one that has already been solved. QED.

I’m reminded of this joke when I read some business continuity plans. A common recommendation in the industry is to plan for the worst possible case. You should, so the advice goes, plan for the worst thing that could happen (your building being totally destroyed) and plan for it happening at the worst time of year (during the Christmas rush, or just before an SEC filing).

It sounds like a good idea: if you can survive the worst possible disaster, then you must be able to survive a lesser (but more probable) disaster. But it’s potentially an expensive one.

If the plan only deals with the worst possible case, then it is rather like the mathematician making tea. The only course of action open is to pretend that the worst possible case has occurred, resulting in an expensive and possibly time-consuming response and recovery.

A good plan should have the flexibility to be useful in a variety of circumstances. No incident will exactly happen as planned and some types of incident are more likely than others.

A good plan should provide the information required to react to the situation as it is, rather than the worst possible incident that might have occurred.

15 February 2009

To get notified when new articles appear, subscribe to the Risky Thinking Newsletter. It's low volume: we don't send out an issue unless there is something interesting to say. You can also subscribe to our RSS Feed

Recently published articles can also be found here.

Agree or disagree? I'd like to hear your thoughts. Please initially use the contact form to get in touch.